Water in liquid form is thought to be a necessity for life on Earth.
Naturally, some say that life may flourish under other conditions, and perhaps even in the absence of water.
While
that may be true, take a look around - life seems to do quite well here
on Earth and we've yet to find it elsewhere in our Solar System.
Based
on this, let's look at the classical definition for the habitable zone
as the region around a star, such as our own Sun, where the temperature
of any orbiting planet permits water in liquid form.
Astrophysicists
are extremely good at calculating the temperature of a star and then,
taking into account the distance of a planet from its host star, it is
easy to work out the planet's "equilibrium temperature".
The
starlight (in our case, sunlight) that falls onto the planet is
reradiated as heat and, hey presto, we have our actual planet
temperature - simple. Except it isn't.
Greenhouse gases
What
if the planet sports a blanket of white clouds? Clouds are reflective
and therefore will cool the planet, acting to push the habitable zone
closer to the star.
Amusingly, if we calculate this "equilibrium
temperature" for the Earth, taking into account its beautifully
reflective clouds, then it turns out that we live outside the classical
habitable zone!
The same calculation for Venus gives an expected equilibrium temperature of about -10°C, but in reality it is more like 450°C.
What happened?
Both these planets have
greenhouse gases present in their atmospheres, warming the planet up and
driving the outer boundary of the habitable zone further away from the
star (while clouds drive the inner boundary closer to the star).
The
very latest habitable zone definitions use simulations of these cloud
and greenhouse effects - widening and blurring the crude classical
definition.
Throw into the mix that we currently can't study the
atmospheres of rocky terrestrial exoplanets (and therefore have no idea
whether they have clouds, greenhouse gases, or even an atmosphere at
all!) - then to say "that planet is habitable" is impossible, for the
time-being at least.
No comments:
Post a Comment